About Machine Learning Model RetinaNet
RetinaNet is a state-of-the-art one-stage object detector, recognized for its performance comparable to classical two-stage approaches like Faster R-CNN, while being computationally more efficient. This model was introduced as part of a study focusing on a novel loss function named Focal Loss, designed to address the class imbalance problem in object detection tasks. The introduction of Focal Loss, which concentrates training on a sparse set of difficult examples and mitigates the overwhelming effect of numerous easy negatives, is a significant feature of RetinaNet. This approach was a breakthrough in object detection, allowing RetinaNet to achieve high accuracy more efficiently compared to prior methods.
Model Card
-
Model Details:
- Person or Organization Developing Model: Not explicitly mentioned in the available literature.
- Model Date: The concept of RetinaNet was introduced around 2017.
- Model Version: Original version (specific version not mentioned in the cited sources).
- Model Type: One-stage object detector.
- Training Algorithms, Parameters: Uses Focal Loss for addressing class imbalance.
- Paper or Other Resource for More Information: Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection - arXiv.org
- Citation Details: Not specified.
- License: Not explicitly mentioned.
-
Intended Use:
- Primary Intended Uses: Object detection in images.
- Primary Intended Users: Researchers and developers in computer vision.
- Out-of-scope Use Cases: Specific out-of-scope uses not mentioned.
-
Factors:
- Relevant Factors: Not specified.
- Evaluation Factors: Not specified.
-
Metrics:
- Model Performance Measures: Not explicitly detailed.
- Decision Thresholds: Not specified.
- Variation Approaches: Not specified.
-
Evaluation Data:
- Datasets: Not explicitly mentioned.
- Motivation: To evaluate the effectiveness of Focal Loss.
- Preprocessing: Not specified.
-
Training Data:
- Details: [More Information Needed].
-
Quantitative Analyses:
- Unitary Results: [More Information Needed].
- Intersectional Results: [More Information Needed].
-
Ethical Considerations:
- [More Information Needed].
-
Caveats and Recommendations:
- [More Information Needed].